Digital twin view of the Manhattan skyline
For your industry

Real estate

Emissions caps are now line items. Meet them with instruments that survive an audit, at the cost of compliance rather than the cost of a fine.

Where you are

The penalty clock does not wait for the retrofit

New York's Local Law 97 puts an absolute cap on emissions per square foot for roughly 50,000 buildings, tightening in 2030 and every five years after. Other cities are following. Deep retrofits take years and capital.

Owners need two things at once: a credible path to reduce, and eligible units to cover what cannot be reduced yet, with evidence the city and the auditor accept.

Digital twin view of the Manhattan skyline
What changes

Three things that change for you

01

Right instrument for the gap

EACs where the rule allows them for electricity, verified removal and reduction for the residual, typed so nothing is applied where it is not eligible.

02

Priced against the fine

The penalty is statute: $268 per tonne over the limit. Run the numbers for your building below.

03

A record per building

Retirements are serialized and evidenced per asset, ready for the filing and for the lender.

How Triangle delivers it

Compliance you can file

Scope routing, custody and the New York program itself.

What is driving this

The requirements, and who sets them

Carbon stopped being discretionary. These are the rules that put it on your desk, and what each one actually asks for.

Local Law 97
Absolute emissions cap
$268 per tonne over the limit, every year, tightening in 2030.
BERDO, BEPS and successors
Other cities following
Boston, Washington DC and others run comparable caps on their own schedules.
CSRD and ISSB
Portfolio disclosure
Asset-level data rolled up, with assurance.
Lender covenants
Green debt pricing
Verified performance supports better terms on refinancing.
Tenant requirements
Scope 3 pressure downward
Corporate tenants with their own targets now ask before signing.
Insurance
Climate risk in the premium
Underwriters price measured resilience, not intention.
What runs underneath

From the asset to the ledger

Meter and benchmarking data per building becomes the input, and the output is a unit you can file against the cap.

01
Digital twin
A virtual representation of the physical asset, fed by meters, IoT and operating records, so performance is visible continuously instead of annually.
02
D-MRV and verification
Partner methodologies measure the result and independent verifiers check it against the protocol before anything is issued.
03
Minting
The verified result is minted into a regulated asset with a serial number, methodology and verification attached, under BMA licence.
04
Custody
Held by a qualified custodian, on a balance sheet, pledgeable as collateral, ratable and insurable.
05
List, settle, retire
Post to the deal listings to sell, draw down by API per transaction, or retire on demand with the evidence record attached.

Every step is the same infrastructure described on Platform and Services, pointed at your assets.

The digital twin engine

You cannot manage what you do not measure

Digital twinning takes a physical asset and creates a virtual representation carrying transparent, current data on how it performs. Operating, economic, insurance and carbon information flow from the same record, so performance is benchmarked rather than estimated.

Twins link meters and building systems to each property, so benchmarking, the LL97 filing and the lender's covenant all draw on one current record instead of three reconstructions.

In traditional asset administration the data stops at the operator. A twin lets you organise it, route it to defined stakeholders on a permissioned basis, and cut the cost of administering the asset while improving how it runs.

Reading continuously
Emissions per building, continuously, not annually
The filing and the covenant from one dataset
Tenant-level attribution for Scope 3 conversations
Retrofit decisions made on measured baselines
Portfolio roll-up without manual consolidation
Digital twin view of the Manhattan skyline
The twin, in the product
Minting as a service

The Asset Factory

Once measurement and verification are certified by a D-MRV partner, Triangle creates the asset in the Asset Factory and lists it on the registry. Carbon credits require regulatory oversight, which is why issuance sits inside a BMA-licensed entity rather than beside one.

01

Mint

Certificates and registry credits from partner protocols are converted into fungible, serialized regulated assets. Triangle mints carbon credits and RECs so customers can custody them and use them for compliance.

02

Custody

Minted assets are held in custody, including at the customer's own bank, where they carry balance-sheet value, can be pledged as collateral, rated and insured.

03

List and sell

Assets are posted to the deal listings to sell, bought by other parties for their compliance needs, or held for appreciation. Settlement and retirement are recorded per serial.

Triangle has partnered with leading registries and protocols to convert their certificates into fungible assets, across cover crops, dairy, forestry, methane capture and engineered removal.

Sustainability-linked asset registry

Chain of custody, for the life of the asset

The registry gives buyers and sellers the same view: what the asset is, where it came from, who has held it and what has happened to it. Auditability and verifiability are the point of it, not a feature of it.

Because issuance happens inside a regulated entity, what comes out is a financial asset that can be transacted between buyer and seller rather than a certificate that has to be explained.

The Triangle RegistrySee what is listed
Asset record
Provenance
Methodology, project and verifier attached to every serial
Performance
Tracked over the life of the asset, not captured at issuance and left
Transfer
Between accounts, custodians and registries, each move recorded
Retirement
Cancels permanently, on chain and at source
Reporting
Lines up with IFRS, ISSB, CSRD and TCFD
Scope 3

Stakeholders, upstream and downstream

Scope 3 is a data-routing problem before it is a carbon problem. Triangle gives every stakeholder a digital identity with nested attributes for Scopes 1 to 3, aggregates them by category, and routes the result to whoever is entitled to see it, annually, monthly or in real time depending on how sophisticated the counterparty is.

Upstream
TenantsSuppliersUtilities and service providersD-MRV and verifiers
Your position
Real estate owner
Scope 1 and 2 accounted here; Scope 3 routed both ways
Downstream
InvestorsLendersInsurersCity programs
What movesHow it is heldWho it reaches
Building emissionsDigital ID per propertyDOB filing, lender, investors
Tenant attributionNested Scope 3, upstream and downstreamTenant Scope 3 reporting
Compliance unitsSerial and retirement recordFiling, auditor, insurer

Tenants sit upstream of the building and downstream of their own supply chains, which is why the same record has to route both ways.

Where the money is

Cost line, or asset

The same tonne behaves very differently depending on what it is issued as. This is the difference in your numbers.

01

Cheaper than the fine

The penalty is statutory and annual. Compliance instruments are priced against it, not against a retrofit.

02

Green debt

Verified performance supports better terms at refinancing, on a portfolio where basis points are the whole margin.

03

Cost shared with tenants

Corporate tenants with their own Scope 3 targets have a reason to fund part of the building's compliance.

Local Law 97

Run your building

LL97 caps emissions per square foot for buildings over 25,000 square feet and tightens sharply in 2030. The penalty is statute: $268 for every tonne of CO2e over the limit, every year. The calculator on the New York analysis page takes your size, type and benchmarked emissions and returns exposure for both enacted periods, the smoothed alternative, and the credit cost at a price you supply.

Run your buildingThe full LL97 analysis
  • 50,000 covered buildings; about 8% non-compliant today.
  • The 2030 tightening sweeps roughly 24,500 more into non-compliance in one year.
  • $512M annual citywide penalty exposure at 2030; about $1.02B a year across owners and corporate tenants.
  • A smoothed 5 to 8% annual tightening replaces four market shocks with one manageable arc.

Learn more

Next step

Get started

Tell us about your situation and we will route it to the right person.